Re: "Fossil Names Don't Live Forever"

[Dinogeorge@aol.com]

In a message dated 2/3/02 1:51:48 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
Mickey_Mortimer11@email.msn.com writes:

<< That's twelve genera. >>

Sure! What I had in mind when I thought of the question, however, was having 
the same species (or specimen, before it had a species name attached to it) 
being shifted around from genus to genus, not merely the genus with the 
greatest number of synonyms. That's a somewhat different but equally 
interesting question, by the way: So--is Massospondylus with twelve synonyms 
the max?