Re: Dinosaur Genera List update #196

["Aspidel" <aspidel@wanadoo.be>]

> Aaargh!  I meant _Cryptovolans pauli_.  I apologize for the mix-up.
Apparently,
> _Archaeovolans_ is nothing new, although it's nice to see new photos.  I
would
> like to see intensive independent analysis of _Cryptovolans_ to see what
other
> paleontologists have to say about the specimens.  We have read Gregory S.
Paul's
> support for the interpretation by Czerkas et al. that this looks to be a
genuine
> flying dromaeosaur.  Let's see what other scientists make of it.
>
> ----------Ralph W. Miller III

Just read the latest Prehistoric Times. It seems that new specimens are
gonna be described - I "W4TP".
Maybe they'll clear up things.

Cheers - Aspidel.