[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: titanosaurs
In a message dated 12/2/02 11:47:17 AM EST, qilongia@yahoo.com writes:
<< Many titanosaur features are found in it, in fact: non-forking haemal
spines, neural arches of caudal vertebrae set forward on the centrum, neural
arches of dorsal vertebrae short in height and the spine comprises less than
1/2 the height of the vertebrae, as well it is caudally inclined, six sacral
vertebrae, pubis longer than ischium, femur with distinct lateral tubercle
and femur with deeper fibular condyle than tibial, resulting in a wide-gauge
stance, manus without much articular area for extra phalanges, and metacarpal
arch bound into a tight C-shape, ulna with distinct olecranon jutting far out
from the humeral posterior margin in side view, and with a distinct medial
crista separated from the proximal margin by a cleft or fossa, ulna
distinctly shorter than the humerus by less than 75%, a squared off distal
scapula and a gross scapulocoracoid shape identical to some titanosaurs. >>
This is what I call a "synapomorphy war": a deluge of incredibly minor
characters of dubious taxonomic utility thrown together in a torrent
purporting to show that a number of specimens belong to the same taxon. In
truth, for any two specimens, there is at most >one< character that is a true
synapomorphy for them (and it might not even be in the list of matching
characters, such as the above). All the other similar characters are either
convergences (because they arose independently in both lineages after they
split from the common ancestor) or plesiomorphies (because they were already
present in the lineage leading up to the common ancestor). The likelihood of
two or more of these characters arising together at >exactly< the same time
in the common ancestor species is nil. So--which of these characters, if any,
is the unique synapomorphy that places Opisthocoelicaudia into a titanosaur
taxon? How would you go about demonstrating this? (I already noted, for
example, that non-forking haemal spines is a plesiomorphy for Dinosauria and
should not even appear in this particular synapomorphy war.)