[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Submitting new artwork to the wrath of the DML



As far as I know, the arguments for the inclusion of those features are as follows, in no particular order:
 
1. It's one way of interpreting the features indicated by some rugosities.
2. The projections may have served to shade the eyes from the sun to facilitate vision or to protect the eyes from injury somewhat.
3. They may have been for sexual display.
4. Reasons 1-3 coupled with 'I just like the way it looks.' ;-)
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: Submitting new artwork to the wrath of the DML

In a message dated 4/13/02 12:52:44 PM Eastern Daylight Time, theclaw10@charter.net writes:


<< Hi again...this is just a request for a brief critique of my latest
(lipless!) _Tyrannosaurus_ portrait...off-list replies probably
preferred...thanks! >>


      No wrath here, just a question. I see so many theropods depicted with a "spectacle" of large stud-like scales or osteoderms ringing the orbit. I believe this idea goes back to Greg Paul. What is the rationale for this feature? I fear I've missed something. DV