[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
New paper: typology vs transformation in origin of birds
A somewhat topical paper, to say the least...
Padian, K. and Horner, J.R. (2002). Typology versus transformation in the
origin of birds. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 17(3): 120-124.
Abstract
"The questions of bird ancestry and the evolution of typically 'avian'
features appear never-ending. This is true in the press but not in the
scientific trenches, where the methods of comparative biology are
productively used to settle many major questions, including the origin of
birds. Opponents of the view that birds evolved from dinosaurs tend to use
typological characterizations of 'reptiles' and 'birds'; although they
accept evolution, their approaches do not use the transformational
approaches of phylogenetic systematics, against which hypotheses of
evolutionary change in function, physiology and behavior should be tested.
'Typologists' also tend to depend on knowledge of how evolutionary processes
must work, rather than on comparing independent patterns of evidence. Both
typological and transformational approaches can be evolutionary, but the
utility of typology is limited because it stresses taxonomic gaps rather
than mosaic transitions."
Tim
------------------------------------------------------------
Timothy J. Williams
USDA-ARS Researcher
Agronomy Hall
Iowa State University
Ames IA 50014
Phone: 515 294 9233
Fax: 515 294 3163