[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Why is the PhyloCode so strict? (long)

To: "The Dinosaur Mailing List" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Why is the PhyloCode so strict? (long)
From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 23:03:36 +0100
References: <v04220819b819c0d698e3@[132.235.145.131]> <000d01c16e1f$97c69520$b4432fd5@telekabel.at>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

AAAAAH! Sorry!!! This was intended for the PhyloCode mailing list, and I
instinctively put this list in the To: line... :-] Now I can only hope this
will attract more people to the PhyloCode mailing list, whose members still
seem to consist mainly of US botanists... Apologies again.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Why is the PhyloCode so strict? (long)
  - From: "Tracy L. Ford" <dino.hunter@home.com>

References:
- Re: Why is the PhyloCode so strict? (long)
  - From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: Re: Why is the PhyloCode so strict? (long)
Next by Date: casts photos (again)
Previous by thread: Re: Why is the PhyloCode so strict? (long)
Next by thread: RE: Why is the PhyloCode so strict? (long)
Indexes: