|
David Marjanovic
wrote-
>>>
Ligabueino also has this? Where was it described?
>> It was described in-
Bonaparte, J. Formation, 1996. "Cretaceous
Tetrapods of Argentina," Muenchner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen 30A: 73-130
[April 1996].
> Thanks :-) Let's see if I can find
this...
I'll send you a scan of the figure. Anyone
else want one? (reply offlist)
>>> IIRC
Dandakosaurus is from India (far away from China then)? And
Lukousaurus... didn't someone think it was a crocodylomorph or
something?
>http://www.dinosauria.com/dml/dmlf.htm and
http://dinosauricon.com/places/index.html might
be a good start.
Good idea. Seems as if India was a lot closer
to Africa, Antarctica and Australia. Still, you could always cross over
Europe to get to China.
>Hah! Didn't I know it? Shortly after I first
read of Sinraptoridae years ago, I thought it should include all so-called
carnosaurs from MJ-LJ Asia, based on no evidence and a few opinions on
websites... B-) What a coincidence!
Yes, but not all large Jurassic theropods from
China were sinraptorids. "Szechuanosaurus" zigongensis is probably more
basal, as might be Xuanhanasaurus.
>Is Lukousaurus really
Triassic?
No, it's from the Dark Red Beds of the
Lower Lufeng Formation, making it Early Jurassic
(Hettangian-Pliensbachian).
Mickey
Mortimer |