Jaime Headden wrote:
<<Dear List,
Due to a slight disagreement, friend and I are curious as to the technical definition and/or usage of the term "subequal.">> I'd say, given a length _l_ (to which we refer),
something like (l-x)=<l<=(l+x)
I'm sorry but I don't know how to use the proper
characters(with outlook); however I think it's clear
enough
|