|
Hi Thomas,
I reply on-list because comparing artwork to
skeletal stuff is, I think, a good exercise for a new paleoartist (like me) to
help him to make reconstructions more accurate.
It seems to me that the head isn't high enough on
the nose level (the tip is a bit too thin). But I'm not a specialist, so, if
someone has to criticise my point of view, there's no problem for me - do
it.
I send you some images off-list.
Friendly - Luc J. "Aspidel" BAILLY.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 4:58
PM
Subject: Bambiraptor art: need critique
and info.
Hey everyone!
I just finished a Bambiraptor portrait in
preparation for a larger piece. I put it up on the web for everyone to
critique. It's based on Greg Paul's reconstruction in Scientific
American's Book of Dinosaurs. Is Paul's art still the most
accurate? The skull seems shorter in the pictures I've found on the
internet. Does anyone know where I can get more detailed photos of the
skeleton and mainly the skull? I'd really like to get David Burnham's
opinion if anyone know's his email, or if he's on the listserv. Any
info, or comments from everyone here on the list would be greatly
appreciated!
Thanks in advance!!
Thomas Miller
| 