| Greetings all,
Let me see if I can put this into perspective. Horner continues to make the claim that T.rex is scavenger. He has sited numerous characteristics to support this contention. One of which is T.rex's size. Spinosaurus was supposedly bigger, yet Horner calls it a predator. This makes no sense to me. Remember, this is the same man who claimed that T.rex had eyes that were to small for a predator, after admitting that T.rex possessed binocular vision! Somethig very strange is happening here. Don't get me wrong, I have a tremendous amount of respect for the man and his previous work, but I cant shake the feeling that there is an agenda at work here. What it might be, I don't know. Maybe I'm just being paranoid... Brian Buck "Every morning when I wake up, I know its not going to get any better until I go back to sleep again." Al Bundy |