[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: TYRANNOSAURIAN IMPLOSION [long; part 1 of 2]
In a message dated 1/26/01 1:16:08 AM EST, danchure@easilink.com writes:
<< one might be wary of
assuming how unlikely it is to have a number of sympatric species. While a
dozen
DOES seem unlikely, there might well be more than one. In the Morrison,
there are
a number of theropods which reach very large adult size (Saurophaganax,
Ceratosaurus, Torvosaurus, and Allosaurus) and these are found in the same
quarries, implying that they were living close enough together to be buried
together. While these animals may represent several different lineages in
the
Morrison (neoceratosaur, spinosauroid, and allosaurid), they are all large
predators, and with the exception of the tremendously long maxillary teeth in
Ceratosaurus, they don't show a great deal of difference in the business
end of
the axial skeleton.
Similarly, the Triceratops argument, while probably true, should be viewed
with
some caution, as are at least 4 different genera of large sauropod which
occur in
the DNM quarry, showing that one can get overlap in animals with very similar
biology (as far as we can determine what that is). >>
Six months ago, I would have said that there were three tyrannosaurids each
("papa bear," "mama bear," and "baby bear") in Mongolia and in the Lance/Hell
Creek of western North America. Now I've turned into a lumper. In the case of
the Morrison taxa, the distinctions among the sympatric species are pretty
clear; but in the case of Tyrannosaurus rex, the distinctions among the
specimens are muddy indeed.
Perhaps the most interesting way to attack this problem would be to run
cladistic analyses of >the specimens themselves<. Get as many characters as
possible from the specimens, plug these into a computer, and see how the
specimens group together. If you get lots of unresolved polychotomies, you're
probably dealing with a single species with a fair amount of individual
variation. If you get clumps, these may represent definable species or
subspecies. If you get a Hennigian comb, you may be seeing the staged
evolution of a single species. And so on.