[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Sex
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 12:54:43PM -0000, Gavin Rymill scripsit:
> Graydon said:
> > A suggestion I haven't seen is that the tripod stance for high
> > feeding might also have allowed face-to-face breeding. That would
> > seem to go for sauropods as well; if it can stand up to eat leaves,
> > they could lean on each other for mating.
>
> Don't you think that if they have reared up, face to face, then they would
> be leaning inwards with their hind quarters quite a considerable distance
> appart.
This is a question of hip anatomy, but:
a) stegosaurs and sauropods are often illustrated as being able to
achieve a nearly vertical stance
b) they can grasp with the forelimbs to pull closer together
c) it gets the problem into a single degree of freedom -- height
-- rather than two (your tail-up sugguestion) or three (any
conventional 'around the tail' arrangment
Anyone know how vertically a stegosaur _could_ stand?
> I don't feel that their positions would have reached anything like
> the dangerous vertical stance required for the genitalia to meet. It was for
> this reason that in my illustration I put the female with her head down and
> tail raised so that only the male needed to attempt the tripod stance and
> there were no extra sets of forelimbs to get in the way.
That mechanism would work, too, although I wonder about how the tail
_could_ go; there's a very rigid spinal column and an already very low
stance in the forward part of the body; there isn't all that much _to_
lower the head and forelimbs.
--
graydon@dsl.ca
To maintain the end is to uphold the means.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sex
- From: "Demetrios M. Vital" <vita0015@tc.umn.edu>
- References:
- RE: Sex
- From: "Gordon Martin Human" <t_gmhuman@agency.com>
- Re: Sex
- From: "Gavin Rymill" <gavin@gavinrymill.com>
- Re: Sex
- From: Graydon <graydon@dsl.ca>
- Re: Sex
- From: "Gavin Rymill" <gavin@gavinrymill.com>