[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Ducks present and past (was Re: ARE ORNITHOPODS BORING?)

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Ducks present and past (was Re: ARE ORNITHOPODS BORING?)
From: Danvarner@aol.com
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 18:54:51 EST
Reply-to: Danvarner@aol.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

In a message dated 2/14/01 3:15:52 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
kinman@hotmail.com writes:

<< Navesink may still be considered Cretaceous (not certain), but I am 
 pretty certain Hornerstown was found to be Early Paleocene (Danian). >>
     Sorry, Russell says "basal strata of latest Maestrictian age", so 
apparently it contains both. DV.

Prev by Date: Re: Ducks present and past (was Re: ARE ORNITHOPODS BORING?)
Next by Date: New Patogonian fossil-reach area discovered
Previous by thread: Re: Ducks present and past (was Re: ARE ORNITHOPODS BORING?)
Next by thread: Re: Ducks present and past (was Re: ARE ORNITHOPODS BORING?)
Indexes: