[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Dinosaur FAQ #9
In a message dated 2/9/01 11:29:01 AM EST, mike@tecc.co.uk writes:
<< What's the difference between classification, phylogeny, systematics and
cladistics? >>
Classification (also called "taxonomy"): setting up a system of groups and
criteria for placing things into those groups. The system and criteria, as
well as what you want to classify, are up to you. You can (and often do,
subconsciously or consciously) classify stars, cars, postage stamps,
artificial earth satellites, asteroids, geographical features, numbers,
geometrical figures, practically anything at all. In biology, organisms are
almost always classified by evolutionary descent: the organisms in a group
all share a unique common ancestral organism (usually hypothetical and, we
hope, correctly conceived), and the groups comprise "branches" and "twigs" of
a huge hierarchy known as the Tree of Life. This classification system,
developed during the past 250 years or so, has proved the most useful for
biologists.
Systematics is simply the study of systems or of classification.
Phylogeny is tracing the evolution of a group of organisms. It is related to
biological classification because some of the organisms of interest include
those common ancestral organisms from which biological groups evolved.
Cladistics is a method for determining whether two or more organisms should
be classified in the same group or not. Organisms are compared by their
features or characters, and the underlying assumption is that organisms that
share a significant number of such features/characters do so because the
organisms evolved from a common ancestor that had those features, and not
because they developed the features independently of one another. Just how to
count and weigh these features/characters in order to select the useful ones
from the noise, and thereby to construct your biological classification,
depends the particular cladistic algorithm you use and what you already know
or assume about the evolution of the group you're interested in.