[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: _T. rex_ debate in the newspaper
Taken from the article:
"If T-rex and all other tyrannosaurids were just big
vultures," a dinosaur fan from Paso Robles, (San
Luis Obispo county) asked in the Dinosaur Mailing
List, the largest Internet discussion group devoted
to dinosaurs, "why did Triceratops and Torosaurus,
among others, evolve such elaborate and formidable
defensive weapons?" Triceratops had three
prominent horns and a shield-like plate on its head.
There were no other large carnivores besides T-rex
alive at the time
I don't recall this discussion on the list, but I seriously doubt that the
elaborate crests and horns of Triceratops and its kin were used as defense
weapons. Sampson has done more than a formidable job of showing that these
features were display features, and developed after sexual maturity was
reached. Why would juveniles, the animals most vulnerable to predators, not
possess these features if they were truly used for defense? Why would
evolution leave the most vulnerable defenseless while the least vulnerable
possess defense weapons?
Horner mentioned exactly this point in a quote from the article, but it is
about the only part of his hypothesis that I agree with. Larry, Dan, and
others have brought up great points about Carpenter's _Edmontosaurus_ bone. I
only hope that Horner eventually does answer to these questions...
Steve
---
***************************************************************
Steve Brusatte-DINO LAND PALEONTOLOGY
SITE: http://www.geocities.com/stegob
ONLINE CLUB: http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/thedinolanddinosaurdigsite
WEBRING: http://home.wanadoo.nl/dinodata.net/
INTERNATIONAL LANGUAGE SITE: http://www.geocities.com/stegob/international.html
****************************************************************
Get your small business started at Lycos Small Business at
http://www.lycos.com/business/mail.html