[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: ORNITHOLESTES, TITANIS HANDS (again)
At 11:32 18-12-2001 +0000, you wrote:
>-- Phorusrhacoids: I checked the literature quickly this morning and it looks
>like Nick was right to be sceptical: NO MANUAL CLAWS AT ALL for
>_Titanis_. Nick is not the first to point this out, as I recall Ron
Orenstein also
>expressing some scepticism in the past. Chandler's evidence for mobile clawed
>fingers is, as previously pointed out, based on the proximal part of the major
>digit (IIRC). Furthermore, so far as I can tell from other phorusrhacoids,
other
>taxa don't sport claws. In fact, there are comments in the literature
(Patterson &
>Kraglievich 1960) to the effect that no phorusrhacoid forelimb material is
>known (this predates both the discovery of Chandler's material of _Titanis_
and
>of _Aenigmavis_) and the complete wings you see on mounts of, e.g.,
>_Paraphysornis_, are largely hypothetical (like most phorusrhacoid taxa,
>_Paraphysornis_ is actually based on tarsomets and other bits of the hindlimb
>skeleton and pelvis). Wing material may be known for psilopterids but I was
>unable to check this. _Aenigmavis_, if it is a phorusrhacoid, may or may not
>have small alular/major digit unguals (perhaps Fred Ruhe can help?).
>
>DARREN NAISH
>PALAEOBIOLOGY RESEARCH GROUP
>School of Earth & Environmental Sciences
>UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH
>Burnaby Building
>Burnaby Road email: darren.naish@port.ac.uk
>Portsmouth UK tel (mobile): 0776 1372651
>P01 3QL tel (office): 023 92842244
> www.palaeobiology.co.uk
>
Hi Darren,
I have no wingmaterial listed for the Psilopteridae and I have listed
_Aenigmavis_ as a Idiornithidae, possibly a Phorusrhacidae. The digit
material known for this species is phalanx 1 digitus major, the digitus
minor and the digitus alulae. Peters lists no peculiar characters for these
elements. And as far as I can see from the photocopy picture, there are no
pecularities.
Hope it helps,
Fred