visualizing cladograms

["Ken Kinman" <kinman@hotmail.com>]

     I definitely don't want to go back to that 1.2.2.2.1 stuff.  I think 
it was Hennig who tried doing it that way and it's just too ponderous in 
large classifications (and advertizing unnamed clades in that fashion just 
tempts someone to name them).  Been there, tried that.
    I still don't think a simple alphanumeric code would be that hard to 
learn, but I guess we could optionally put abbreviated cladograms to the 
left (let's see how this might work, if the columns line up reasonably 
well):

> Charophycea
> +____1  Chlorokybales
> \++__2  Klebsormidiales
>   \__B  Conjugales
>  \+__3  Coleochaetales
>   \+_4  Charales
>    \_5  {{Metaphyta}}

    Anyway, this is even giving me a headache, so will not post on this 
thread further.  Got some Christmas things that need attending to.......
   "Charophytes roasting on an open fire", ....ooopppps, that isn't right.  
Mustn't mix business with pleasure, I guess.
                     ;-)


_________________________________________________________________
Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com