[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: "real" opisthopuby (very speculative)

To: "Dinosaur Mailing List" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: "real" opisthopuby (very speculative)
From: "Rob Gay" <rob@dinodomain.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 15:19:34 -0700
References: <F11f0MjkatwD43oFLaq00028cc9@hotmail.com> <000801c17f49$65fb6940$d0f8e2a9@albany.edu> <004101c17f6b$00d87ae0$b4432fd5@chello.at>
Reply-to: rob@dinodomain.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

> I've never heard of that paper, but I'd bet _something_ that all
ornithischians he describes there are meanwhile considered Early Jurassic,
so it might not be that interesting.<
Well, personally, I think the early Jurassic is just as interesting! Does
anyone have an exact reference for this paper?
Peace,
Rob

Student of Geology
P.O. Box 20840
Flagstaff, Az. 86011
http://dinodomain.com
http://www.cafepress.com/robsdinos
AIM: TarryAGoat
"A _Coelophysis_ with feathers?"

References:
- Re: "real" opisthopuby (very speculative)
  - From: "Ken Kinman" <kinman@hotmail.com>
- Re: "real" opisthopuby (very speculative)
  - From: "Rob Schenck" <rs7286@albany.edu>
- Re: "real" opisthopuby (very speculative)
  - From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: Re: "real" opisthopuby (very speculative)
Next by Date: Re: Russian Dinosaurs: after Sacramento, where?
Previous by thread: Re: "real" opisthopuby (very speculative)
Next by thread: RE: "real" opisthopuby (very speculative)
Indexes: