[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Starkov's theory and extinction



 
In contrast,
titanosaurs predated T-rex by only a stage or so, in Cordillera.
Where is this?

    What makes Starkov's theory especially interesting is its potential
relevance to dinosaur extinction.  If T-rex was well-adapted to hunt
titanosaurs, the results could have been devastating if or when it gained
access to the titanosaur-dominated faunas of Gondwana. [...] Lacking
co-evolutionary preparation to
withstand T-rex, Gondawana prey could have succumbed very quickly, just as
avian quarry did when the efficient brown tree snake entered Guam.  This
theory resembles Bakker's notion of biogeographic chaos, except that the
principal proposed agency of extinction is predation, not disease.
And it is, sorry :-) , even more simple-minded than Bakker's. T. rex could have wiped out titanosaurs everywhere, you say? Then why didn't Alamosaurus die out in the first place when T. rex evolved? Or, the other way round, why didn't it survive the K-T and spread around the world with T. rex??? And, WHY THE [...vertical gene transfer], did all OTHER non-neornithean dinosaurs die out???

    A devastating, global radiation of T-rex is not a very far-fetched
scenario.
Oh yes it is. Sure. Where is the evidence???
        Of course you can say in this place that the fossil record is incomplete. But a speculation based on no evidence isn't even testable, I fear.
The ability of ungulates to enter southern South America by the
Paleocene, and the migration of marsupials even farther, to Antarctica and
Australia, attests to a high degree of "interconnectedness" of landmasses
around K-T time.  T-rex could also have spread far, and fast, with
devastating results.
Apart from New Zealand, it could not have spread to Africa, Madagascar and India, which were already separate from each other and Antarctica at K-T time. India was just breaking of the Seychelles! So what happened to the titanosaurs there?
        Lambeosaurs (Pararhabdodon) did spread into Spain just before K-T, which indicates that Europe probably fell dry at that time. Evidence of any tyrannosaurs has not been found from anywhere in Cretaceous Europe.

    Of course, this scenario cannot fully explain the K-T event.
Bingo! :-)
Soon I'll
show that a common physical agency of extinction is not necessarily implied
by the lack of a common biological agency on land and at sea.
Sorry, my English stops here, I don't understand that sentence.
 
Looking forward to your next post,
 
David Marjanović