[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Dodson's article in American Paleontologist

To: Zoe Heraklides <z_heraklides@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Dodson's article in American Paleontologist
From: "Kean Stump" <kean_stump@credence.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 08:21:28 -0700
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu, dinotracker@earthlink.net
In-reply-to: <F25gz3FB1FxQFM83UV8000060dd@hotmail.com>; from z_heraklides@hotmail.com on Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 03:09:09PM -0000
References: <F25gz3FB1FxQFM83UV8000060dd@hotmail.com>
Reply-to: kean_stump@credence.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

On Apr 19, Zoe Heraklides wrote:
> cladistic classification. Some people may agree, others may disagree. Some 
> may agree with some things Dr Dodson says, but disagree with others. But let 
> everyone be heard!

What I heard Ray say (saw Ray write?) was "Read Dodson's article, then 
comment" rather than basing commentary on what one reads on the list
itself. Primary vs secondary sources and all that.

Kean

References:
- Re: Dodson's article in American Paleontologist
  - From: "Zoe Heraklides" <z_heraklides@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Dodson's article in American Paleontologist
Next by Date: Re: Lankester Extinct Animals 1905
Previous by thread: Re: Dodson's article in American Paleontologist
Next by thread: Re: Dodson's article in American Paleontologist
Indexes: