Re: Limits of cladistics?

["philidor11" <philidor11@snet.net>]

<Right now, I think cladistics is the best way to determine phylogenetic
relationships because it takes into account
evolutionary changes and states without as much human bias as a simple
morphological analysis.>

Curious; how would you define 'human bias' and what would you say is true of
cladistics that obviates this bias?  How would you distinguish morphological
from cladistic analysis?
Thanks!