[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Gaia theropod follow-up: a "new" phylogeny



Tracy Ford Said:

One thing I don't do (and which good systematists don't do) is recode and
recode until I get a tree I like. <<
That's what I'm talking about. Say the person using Paup doesn't like the
out come of the tree, THEY tweak it until it is something THEY like. Then WE
don't know if the person was right or the computer was right in the first
place. If they always do that then how can we know (as George as said in the
past) which is right? It's like having a chocolate granola bar, it defeats
it's purpose.

Since Ken Kinman and others have followed up on this response already, I will make mine brief. The point is even if there were "bad apples" to quote Kinman, that is the point of peer-reviewed journals and meetings. Science, and thus paleontology, are set up the way they are because we all realize that we are all biased. By having others review our work (in this case, cladograms), we reduce the amount of subjectivity. Also, because cladograms are defined hypotheses about systematic relationships, they can be tested repeatedly by other researchers. Even if everyone from the original researcher to the peer-review board is in on a major scam, when the manuscript is published or when a public talk is given, others not in the circle of deceipt can determine whether or not someone is fibbing by testing those hypotheses. Also, it may not happen overnight -- many things in science are discovered to be erroneous years after, but again, that's the point of publishing these things and exposing them to as many people as possible.


By the way, there is no such thing as right in science. This rings of finding ultimate truth, which is not what science is about. We never prove anything absolutely in science. We only deal with probabilities. But that's for other postings (and many previous ones from me on this list).

Mmmmm ... chocolate granola bar .... aaaah ..... what purpose is defeated here??? =) Just kidding, I get it!

Matt Bonnan
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.