From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@geol.umd.edu>
Reply-To: tholtz@geol.umd.edu
To: <Mickey_Mortimer@email.msn.com>, <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: RE: Enantiornithine or enantiornithean?
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 08:43:46 -0400
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu [mailto:owner-dinosaur@usc.edu]On Behalf Of
Mickey_Mortimer
Here's a question for you all. What is the correct way to refer to a
member of the Enantiornithes? I see most authors use enantiornithine, but
Mike Keesey points out that this creates confusion if one were to be
discussing a member of the Enantiornithinae (if it ever exists, it's
officially implied by the existance of an Enantiornithidae). He suggests
using enantiornithean. The same situation arises for the Tetanurae,
Ornithurae, Neornithes and Avialae. I see tetanuran, ornithurine,
neornithine and avialan most commonly used, but which is proper? Anyone
have any opinions and reasons why one form should be used over the other?
The "traditional" vernacular versions would be "tetanurine", "ornithurine",
"neornithine" and "avialian". However, "tetanuran" does get used a lot,
too. However, I don't recall seeing ornithological literature old or new
that use "ornithurean" or "ornithuran".
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Vertebrate Paleontologist
Department of Geology Director, Earth, Life & Time Program
University of Maryland College Park Scholars
College Park, MD 20742
http://www.geol.umd.edu/~tholtz/tholtz.htm
http://www.geol.umd.edu/~jmerck/eltsite
Phone: 301-405-4084 Email: tholtz@geol.umd.edu
Fax (Geol): 301-314-9661 Fax (CPS-ELT): 301-405-0796