_Dilophosaurus breedorum_

["Jordan Mallon" <j_mallon@hotmail.com>]

T. Michael Keesey wrote:

> > You're forgeting about the newly described D. breedorum.
>
> Speaking of which, have a look at this new, somewhat jarring,
> reconstruction of _D. wetherilli_ by Alessandro Marisa:
> <http://dinosauricon.com/images/dilophosaurus-am.html>

Could this new _Dilophosaurus breedorum_ not represent a sexual difference 
in the _wetherilli_ species?  Or are the two species from completely 
different ages and/or formations?  There doesn't seem to be much on this 
topic in the archives.

- Jordan Mallon

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com