Re: Help indentifying dino species!

["Mickey Mortimer" <mickey_mortimer@email.msn.com>]

Nick Pharris wrote-

> _Dilophosaurus_:
> _D. wetherilli_ (probably the only valid species of _Dilophosaurus_; _"D."
> sinensis_ does not belong in this genus).

You're forgeting about the newly described D. breedorum.

> _Stegosaurus_:
> badly in need of review.  This looks like the species commonly called _S.
> stenops_, but it is unclear whether this species is synonymous with the
type
> species _S. armatus_, whether it is a distinct species in the same genus,
or
> whether it is a distinct genus (the type of _S. armatus_ has never been
fully
> prepared).

Yep, you're right.  I confused S. ungulatus with S. stenops in my reply
(that's why I'm a theropod worker...).

Mickey Mortimer