From: crnoto@midway.uchicago.edu (Chris Noto)
To: m38jeep@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Platyhystrix and dinosaur humps/sails
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 08:42:37 -0600
I'm just curious, what good would a large, ungainly hump (especially one 6
ft tall in the case of Spinosaurus) be to a predator? Furthermore, didn't
Suchomimus inhabit broad river deltas? It too had a low sail, but didn't
neccesarily inhabit hot environments. I'm all for the sexual display
theory myself, at least as it relates to the dinosaurs.
Chris
>>From: AM Yates <Adam.Yates@bristol.ac.uk>
>>Reply-To: Adam.Yates@bristol.ac.uk
>>To: Mary Nalasco <m38jeep@hotmail.com>
>>CC: DINOSAUR@USC.EDU
>>Subject: Re: Platyhystrix and dinosaur humps/sails
>>Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:46:01 +0000 (GMT)
>>
>>
>>
>>On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Mary Nalasco wrote:
>>
>> > Hello, all-
>> >
>> > I was going through some of my books and came across a picture of the
>> > sailbacked amphibian, Platyhystrix. The spines on its back resembled
>>those
>> > of Spinosaurus and Ouranosaurus- flat and blade-like. I've never seen
>>its
>> > skeleton, just a few illustrations, but I was wondering this: if we
were
>>to
>> > say dinosaurs have humps because their spines resemble humped
mammals,
>> > shouldn't we say the same for Platyhystrix?
>>
>>I have seen the vertebrae of Platyhistrix (to my knowledge there is no
>>complete skeleton) and although the neural spines were flat and blade
>>like a hump is out of the question. The sides of spines are ornamented
>>with rough pits and bumps which in amphibian fossils indicates a close
>>association with a thin skin or possibly even a horny covering. There is
>>a sharp line between the rough
>>ornamented bone and the smooth bone over which muscles and other tissues
>>lay. The genus Aspidosaurus may be paraphyletic with respect to
>>Platyhistix (ie. contains its ancestor) and shows that the spines
>>evolved from a vertebral series of armour plates that fused to the
>>nueral spines and grew tall. The show every intergrade from low bumps to
>>tall Platyhistrix like spines. Further more well preserved spines show
>>that web of skin between the spines did not extend all the way to the
>>top of the sail (it only goes halfway up or less). This was probably the
>>case in Platyhistrix as well but poorer preservation of the material
>>I've seen made this hard to determine.
>>
>>cheers
>>
>>Adam Yates
>>
>>
>So, if Platyhystrix is known to have a sail, has anyone ever compared its
>spines to one of the high-spined dinosaurs? I'm not really partial to
either
>the hump or the sail theory at present, but wouldn't an amphibian with
>broad, flat spines that form a sail go against the hump theory in
>Spinosaurus and Ouranosaurus?
>
> -M. Nalasco
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
-----------------------------------
Chris Noto
University of Chicago
c-noto@uchicago.edu
(773) 947-0734
"If I had a good quote I would put it here."