Re: Archaeoraptor liaoningensis

["peter von sholly" <vonrex@gte.net>]

I would be interested in hearing from somebody on the list about this story.
Someone in posession of the facts and with the knowledge to shed some light
on this controversial fossil? Back when this find was announced I recall
rumblings of chimeras and "fakery" then there was a pronounced silence, and
finally this news. Where do you dino-mavens stand on this?
-----Original Message-----
From: Phillip Bigelow <bh162@scn.org>
To: dinosaur@usc.edu <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Date: Sunday, January 16, 2000 10:02 PM
Subject: Archaeoraptor liaoningensis


>Sorry in advance if this story has been beaten to death here on the dino
>list.
>Another news blurb on Archaeoraptor liaoningensis.  Phil Currie has his
>say on the matter.  Stephen Czerkas is still reserving judgement.
>An interesting read.  Looks like the whole article is available on this
>one.
>
>http://www.sciencenews.org/20000115/fob6.asp
>
>                                    <pb>
>
>
>
>