[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: _Rocasaurus_
Jaime "James" A. Headden wrote:
> Might be a little confusing, but at least with the ICZN 1966 edition,
> it won't have to be renamed for sake of *Roccosaurus.*
Wouldn't have to, anyway -- Roccosaurus is a _nomen nudum_ (and apparently
synonymous with _Melanorosaurus_).
> Any details? Yet more dinos from the Allen....
All I've heard that it's 8-9m long, and the sister group of _Saltasaurus_
(closer than _Neuquensaurus_). (I had it listed as being 50m? long on my
site for a short while -- that was an error due to confusion with the huge
Rio Limay titanosaur.)
_____________________________________________________________________________
T. MICHAEL KEESEY
Home Page <http://dinosauricon.com/keesey>
The Dinosauricon <http://dinosauricon.com>
personal <keesey@bigfoot.com> --> <tmk@dinosauricon.com>
work, binary files <mkeesey@dcentgroup.com>
Dinosauricon-related <dinosaur@dinosauricon.com>
AOL Instant Messenger <Ric Blayze>
ICQ <77314901>
Yahoo! Messenger <Mighty Odinn>