Re: MARGINOCEPHALIANS and Triassic times

["spockjr" <spockjr@email.msn.com>]

True, I hear where you're coming from.

----- Original Message -----
From: <Dinogeorge@aol.com>
To: <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2000 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: MARGINOCEPHALIANS and Triassic times


> In a message dated 4/21/00 10:24:07 AM EST, spockjr@email.msn.com writes:
>
> << I have seen Lotosaurus (albeit photographs)
>  it is definately not Lotosaurus.  Although, speculation
>  aside, anything is possible.  I did not mean to imply that
>  Shuvosaurus is, without a doubt, an ornithomimosaur,
>  only that it is more like an ornithomimosaur than
>  anything else. The postcranial material is certainly
>  theropodan. >>
>
> No, Shuvosaurus is not Lotosaurus. But the original Shuvosaurus
description
> says nothing about Lotosaurus, and the two fossils should definitely have
> been compared.