[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Segnosauria vs. Therizinosauria
In a message dated 4/6/00 4:04:48 PM EST, twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com writes:
<< It may come to be that the teeth named _Troodon_ are not diagnostic at the
genus/species level (as happened for _Deinodon_ and _Trachodon_). If so, it
too gets flung into the abyss as a _nomen dubium_. This possibility has been
raised a few times (and I think once in a paper by Tom Holtz - apologies if
I'm mis-quoting; I'm going from memory). Should this occur, we go back to
calling this family the Saurornithoididae. _Saurornithoides_ is based upon a
reasonable specimen. _Troodon_ isn't. My point is that it might have been
easier back in the 1980's to retain the name Saurornithoididae for this
family, irrespective of the "new" _Troodon_ material that was being described
at the time. >>
I wouldn't be at all surprised if Troodon is soon declared a nomen dubium.
Then Troodontidae would be replaced by the next oldest family-level taxon,
which is indeed Saurornithoididae. There is, however, a peculiarity that may
develop. If the genus Ornithodesmus, which is now known to be a small
theropod, proves to be a troodontid, then its family name Ornithodesmidae
Hooley, 1913 takes precedence over >both< Troodontidae Gilmore, 1924 (coined
when Troodon was thought to be a pachycephalosaur, senior synonym of
Stegoceras) and Saurornithoididae Barsbold, 1974.