[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Gliders to Fliers? (Was Re: Ruben Strikes Back)

To: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Subject: Re: Gliders to Fliers? (Was Re: Ruben Strikes Back)
From: dbensen <dbensen@gotnet.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 10:10:42 -0700
Cc: mbonnan@hotmail.com, dinosaur@usc.edu
References: <1c910069.251fac8a@aol.com>
Reply-to: dbensen@gotnet.net
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

>>There are too many "perhaps this" and "perhaps that" arguments and
counterarguments in this issue. Not enough constraints to settle the
question, certainly not enough constraints to reject any reasonable
hypothesis.<<
I agree completely.  Sombody needs to do some locomotion work like Bakker did
with the crocodiles.  Maybe the most constructive outcome of Gliders to Fliers?
could be a list of all the things we need to study to get an answer.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Gliders to Fliers? (Was Re: Ruben Strikes Back)
  - From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@geol.umd.edu>

References:
- Re: Gliders to Fliers? (Was Re: Ruben Strikes Back)
  - From: Dinogeorge@aol.com

Prev by Date: Re: Gliders to Fliers?
Next by Date: Re: Gliders to Fliers? (Was Re: Ruben Strikes Back)
Previous by thread: Re: Gliders to Fliers? (Was Re: Ruben Strikes Back)
Next by thread: RE: Gliders to Fliers? (Was Re: Ruben Strikes Back)
Indexes: