[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Little skulls...
I think Jamie misunderstood my comment about the Ospreys when he said:
> The necessity of swalling fish first would not
> decapitate the animals. Humans, I think, are the only
> lifeform that habitually decapitate their fish; (SNIP) I know of no
such animal that regurgitates only _part_ of the animal, much less just
the skull,<
The scenario I described did not involve the adult regurgitating food to
the chicks. As I stated, Osprey and other predatory birds (particularly
fish eating birds) do regularly eat the heads of the fish before bringing
the rest of the _uneaten_ fish to the nest for the hatchlings. I have
also observed an Osprey removing (by eating) the head of an eel before
bringing the rest of the uneaten eel to the nest. Removing the head of
the prey assures that the prey is dead and therefore poses no danger to
the hatchlings. What I intended to suggest was that presence of the two
small skulls in the Oviraptor nest might indicate a similar behavior in
the adult Oviraptor if the location of the skulls could be interpreted as
stomach contents of the adult.
And I appreciate Jamie's comments about the location of the little skulls
in the Oviraptor nest, but I'm not sure proximity to eggshell, by itself,
rules out the possibility that the skulls were from the stomach (or the
crop) of the adult--since things would tend to spill out at some point
during decomposition.
The absence of any postcranial dromeosaurid material in the nest might
also support the idea that the adult O ate the heads of the small
dromeosaurs if another analogy to modern predatory birds is
considered--the fact that adult Osprey regularly clean their nest of
uneaten material and wastes from their chicks. If the Osprey nest I
observed had been buried and fossilized after the adult cleaned its nest
of the remains of the eel, the "fossil" would show the bones of the adult
Osprey, its chicks and the skull of an eel.
Pat