[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Long Necks

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Long Necks
From: "T. Mike Keesey" <tkeese1@gl.umbc.edu>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 11:35:05 -0400 (EDT)
In-reply-to: <9b98db8e.25269324@aol.com>
Reply-to: "T. Mike Keesey" <tkeese1@gl.umbc.edu>
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

On Fri, 1 Oct 1999 Dinogeorge@aol.com wrote:

> Necks of many Chinese sauropods (euhelopodids, mamenchisaurids)
...

Is there a difference? The only recent study I've heard of that disbands
Euhelopodidae (Wilson & Sereno's) didn't include _Mamenchisaurus_, did it?
I'm interested to hear an alternate placement of _Mamenchisaurus_.

--T. Michael Keesey
tkeese1@gl.umbc.edu | THE DINOSAURICON: http://dinosaur.umbc.edu/
AOL IM:   RicBlayze | WORLDS:    http://www.gl.umbc.edu/~tkeese1/

References:
- Re: Long Necks
  - From: Dinogeorge@aol.com

Prev by Date: Re: Avian paleontology and evolution
Next by Date: Re: Long Necks
Previous by thread: Re: Long Necks
Next by thread: Fwd: Long Necks
Indexes: