[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: The validity of cladograms (was Re: giant birds)

To: Tracy Ford <tlford@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: RE: The validity of cladograms (was Re: giant birds)
From: "T. Mike Keesey" <tkeese1@gl.umbc.edu>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 1999 20:10:18 -0500
Cc: Dinonet <dinosaur@usc.edu>
In-reply-to: <LOBBKOBIBIOGIJBMFMDMOEIHCEAA.tlford@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-to: tkeese1@gl.umbc.edu
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

On Sun, 14 Nov 1999, Tracy Ford wrote:

> That -certain select groups etc, is what I'm talking about. Capain Clade
> one, has a difference clade from Captain Clade two. Which one is right?
> Which clade is right. Those minor differences are major in the schme of
> things. They, for some of us, turn us off to clades.

Like traditional taxonomists always agreed...

--T. Michael Keesey
tkeese1@gl.umbc.edu | THE DINOSAURICON: http://dinosaur.umbc.edu/
AOL IM:  Ric Blayze | WORLDS:    http://www.gl.umbc.edu/~tkeese1/

References:
- RE: The validity of cladograms (was Re: giant birds)
  - From: "Tracy Ford" <tlford@ix.netcom.com>

Prev by Date: Re: giant birds
Next by Date: Re: giant birds
Previous by thread: Re: The validity of cladograms (was Re: giant birds)
Next by thread: RE: The validity of cladograms (was Re: giant birds)
Indexes: