[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Fixing Feathers

To: "'Dinogeorge@aol.com'" <Dinogeorge@aol.com>, "dinosaur@usc.edu@usc.edu"@usc.edu
Subject: RE: Fixing Feathers
From: Toby White <augwhite@neosoft.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 20:05:37 -0500
Reply-to: "toby.white@chamberlainlaw.com" <toby.white@chamberlainlaw.com>
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu


On Thursday, May 27, 1999 3:59 PM, Dinogeorge@aol.com [SMTP:Dinogeorge@aol.com] 
wrote:
> In a message dated 5/27/99 3:18:34 PM EST, augwhite@neosoft.com writes:
>
> << Why not?  I suppose I'd just taken it for granted that they were
> homologous
>  without any special reason to think so.  Is there a special reason to think
>  they are not? >>
>
> For one thing, they are composed of different substances.

Oops.  Right you are.  I was thinking of amniote-type keratinous scales.

  --Toby White

Prev by Date: Re: Feathers on Bloody Everything
Next by Date: Re: fixing dinosaur question
Previous by thread: Fixing Feathers
Next by thread: Re: Fixing Feathers
Indexes: