[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Weird mammal cladograms, and dino implications

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Weird mammal cladograms, and dino implications
From: Ronald Orenstein <ornstn@home.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 21:17:20 -0400
In-reply-to: <Pine.OSF.4.10.9905111405500.27661-100000@sage.plu.edu>
References: <4.1.19990511150706.01c26850@mail>
Reply-to: ornstn@home.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

>> This is news to me - references?  And as turacos are confined to Africa
>> today, do they really belong here?
>
>Dang it, I knew I shoulda looked it up.  Maybe it was musophagids?  It was
>someone on the list who mentioned it...Darren Naish?
>
>-Nick P.

Ah... Nick... Musophagids ARE turacos.
--
Ronald I. Orenstein                           Phone: (905) 820-7886
International Wildlife Coalition              Fax/Modem: (905) 569-0116
1825 Shady Creek Court                 
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5L 3W2          mailto:ornstn@home.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Weird mammal cladograms, and dino implications
  - From: Pharris Nicholas J <pharrinj@plu.edu>

References:
- Re: Weird mammal cladograms, and dino implications
  - From: Ronald Orenstein <ornstn@home.com>

Prev by Date: Dinheirosaurus lourinhanensis, a new diplodocid from Portugal
Next by Date: Re: Giant flightless birds
Previous by thread: Re: Weird mammal cladograms, and dino implications
Next by thread: Re: Weird mammal cladograms, and dino implications
Indexes: