--On Monday, May 03, 1999, 2:58 PM -0500 TWILLIAMS@canr1.cag.uconn.edu wrote: >> Now if _Lanasaurus_ >> is a valid taxon and it does lack the caniniform teeth, > > It does? Maybe it's just a female, or a juvenile, and only males had > "tusks". I see the confusion here, I meant to say that "if it is a valid taxon and if it then lacks the caniniform teeth..."