[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Important feathered dinosaurs

To: Ronald Orenstein <ornstn@home.com>
Subject: Re: Important feathered dinosaurs
From: Mike Keesey <tmk@dinosaur.umbc.edu>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 16:56:20 -0500 (EST)
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
In-reply-to: <4.2.2.19991206150958.00b96810@mail>
Reply-to: tmk@dinosaur.umbc.edu
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Ronald Orenstein wrote:

> By "unquestionably" I mean "so clearly a dinosaur that even Feduccia et al 
> can't call it one".  I quite accept that Caudipteryx is "pretty 
> comfortable" as an oviraptorisaur, but Larry Martin will gladly give you 
> several osteological reasons for saying otherwise.

OOC, what are his reasons?

-- T. Michael Keesey .................................. <tmk@dinosaur.umbc.edu>
   My Worlds (including The Dinosauricon) ... <http://dinosaur.umbc.edu/keesey>
   AOL Instant Messenger ......................................... <Ric Blayze>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Important feathered dinosaurs
  - From: luisrey <luisrey@ndirect.co.uk>

References:
- Re: Important feathered dinosaurs
  - From: Ronald Orenstein <ornstn@home.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Important feathered dinosaurs
Next by Date: Reference for Dinosauria definition
Previous by thread: Re: Important feathered dinosaurs
Next by thread: Re: Important feathered dinosaurs
Indexes: