[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: ARCHAEOPTERYX

To: Matthew Troutman <m_troutman@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: ARCHAEOPTERYX
From: Scott A Hartman <ottscay@uwyo.edu>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 1998 16:38:42 -0600 (MDT)
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
In-reply-to: <19981016204339.29499.qmail@hotmail.com>
Reply-to: ottscay@uwyo.edu
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

>>>Anyway, regarding your statement that the anatomy of _Archaeopteryx_
was
"un-controversial"; whoa!  That is a BIG understatement.  Contrast any
Ostrom and Martin paper and you'll see the differences between
opinions.<<<

Actually, it was sarcasm.  With such a strong dichotomy of opinions on
Archaeopteryx morphology (and such disperate phylogenetic inferences made
from those studies) I thought it redundant to put a ;-) at the end.
Sorry.

Scott Hartman

References:
- ARCHAEOPTERYX
  - From: "Matthew Troutman" <m_troutman@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: feathers as N2 excretors
Next by Date: Re: ARCHAEORNITHOMIMUS
Previous by thread: ARCHAEOPTERYX
Next by thread: ZUNICERATOPS AND CRETACEOUS BIOGEOGRAPHY
Indexes: