[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Sarcopterygia -- was Re: choana [was SOME SVP TIDBITS]

To: "King, Norm" <nking.ucs@smtp.usi.edu>
Subject: Sarcopterygia -- was Re: choana [was SOME SVP TIDBITS]
From: "T. Mike Keesey" <tkeese1@gl.umbc.edu>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 09:57:26 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
In-reply-to: <FA35264601EA38D9@smtp.usi.edu>
Reply-to: "T. Mike Keesey" <tkeese1@gl.umbc.edu>
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, King, Norm wrote:

> It appeared first among sarcopterygians, and sarcopertygians plus
> tetrapods are "choanates". 

Aren't tetrapods sarcopterygians? Wouldn't "Choanata" be the same as
Sarcopterygii?

--T. Mike Keesey                                   <tkeese1@gl.umbc.edu>
DINOSAUR WEB PAGES -- http://www.gl.umbc.edu/~tkeese1/dinosaur/index.htm

References:
- Re: choana [was SOME SVP TIDBITS]
  - From: "King, Norm" <nking.ucs@smtp.usi.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: ARCHAEOPTERYX and friends
Next by Date: Re: Nomenclature
Previous by thread: Re: choana [was SOME SVP TIDBITS]
Next by thread: Re: choana [was SOME SVP TIDBITS]
Indexes: