Re: Mononykine or Parvicursorine?

["Jonathan R. Wagner" <znc14@TTACS.TTU.EDU>]

At 02:11 PM 3/29/98 -0500, you wrote:
>In a message dated 98-03-29 11:41:29 EST, znc14@TTACS.TTU.EDU writes:
>
><< You would have to demonstrate
> that the suffix "-inae" *UNEQUIVOCALLY* denotes a subfamily *under the ICZN
> code*. Good luck. >>
>
>Under ICZN rules, the suffix "-inae" is reserved for subfamilies. So if you
>call something x-inae, then you have created a subfamily, even if you don't
>explicitly call it a subfamily. Don't want a subfamily? Invent a different
>suffix.
        Then I stand most assuredly corrected, and they're just gonna have
to say they don't give a padiddle about the ICZN. Under PT "rules",
Mononykinae (or whatever it is) would still hold.
             Beginnings are dangerous times...
        
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Jonathan R. Wagner, Dept. of Geosciences, TTU, Lubbock, TX 79409-1053
          "They cannot follow you if you are dead..." - A Shadow