[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Origin of feathers
On 4/22/98 at 9:24 AM, Jonathan wrote:
>If you've seen the most; recent fossil of O. sitting on it's nest, you
can see it is trying; to cover its eggs to protect them from the
presumably scorching; heat of the Mongolian desert. But, without
feathers, it would have; only covered some of the eggs. Orsen took the
picture of the; Oviraptor fossil and superimposed primary feathers onto
its; forearm and lo and behold they would have perfectly covered; the
eggs. Makes a lot of sense, perhaps more so than any of; the other
theories. It would have offered a great selective advantage; to those
animals which could protect their eggs and subsequently; their young
after hatching. Then feathers could have been exapted; for flight.<
<
This seems reasonable and perfectly consistent with the theory that
feathers first served the purpose of reducing heat transfer to the body
by shading. Feathers are an excellent insulating material. But unless
Orsen is suggesting that Oviraptor was a flyer, I would not expect to see
primary feathers--a derived flight character--on its forearm. Modern
brooding birds protect their eggs from the sun (and the cold) with
fluffed up body feathers. In any event, at the moment of death this
particular Oviraptor was probably protecting its eggs against something
other than the sun.