[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: NO SECONDARILY FLIGHTLESS THEROPODS

To: m_troutman@hotmail.com, dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: NO SECONDARILY FLIGHTLESS THEROPODS
From: Dinogeorge <Dinogeorge@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1998 00:19:42 EDT
Reply-to: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

In a message dated 98-04-05 18:58:43 EDT, m_troutman@hotmail.com writes:

<< I do not see why a more " primitive " species cannot evolve 
 flightlessness in the same way that modern species do. >>

They may, or they may not; they're certainly not >obliged< to. By the way, I
find your posts on paedomorphosis in the evolution of flightlessness quite
interesting. Please keep them coming; you have a good command of the material.

Prev by Date: Dinosaur TV Week
Next by Date: LOTS OF SECONDARILY FLIGHTLESS THEROPODS
Previous by thread: Re: NO SECONDARILY FLIGHTLESS THEROPODS
Next by thread: Re: NO SECONDARILY FLIGHTLESS THEROPODS
Indexes: