RAHONA'S PUBIS

[darren.naish@port.ac.uk]

Yes, those refs I sent in were April Fools jokes. Come on!

I am confused by something in the _Rahona_ paper (_Science_ 279: 
1915-19). On p. 1917, Forster et al. describe the pubic boot and and 
'well developed hypopubic cup' seen in the _Rahona_ pubis. Yet, their 
fig. 4A indicates that the distal end of the pubis is unknown - 
though they have restored it with a foot - and in the caption they 
state 'The pubis is missing its distal end'.

Have I fundamentally misunderstood something here? 

Hooray for _Huehuecuetzpalli_ - what a concise name! (Reynoso 1998). 
Looking forward to a visit from Tim Isles.

"We're gonna need a bigger boat"

DARREN NAISH
darren.naish@port.ac.uk