[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: T-rex predation
Oooo! You said "packs". Now you're gonna get it. Brian?
----------
> From: Dictator-for-life Calvin <MWEDEL@gslan.offsys.ou.edu>
> To: dinosaur@usc.edu
> Subject: Re: T-rex predation
> Date: Wednesday, September 10, 1997 12:43 PM
>
> I don't know too much about energy budgets, etc., but offhand I can't
> think of any modern ecosystems where the *largest* carnivore is
> primarily a scavenger. IMHO (and I'm sure that several have
> expressed this point before me), tyrannosaurs seem WAY overdesigned
> for scavenging.
>
> I've got a couple of questions. First, I'm primarily interested in
> the Lower Cretaceous and my knowledge of the Late Cretaceous lacks
> depth. That said, I have the impression that the spectrum of
> late K carnivores has dromaeosaurs at the small end, tyrannosaurs at
> the large end, and not a whole lot in between. Is this accurate?
> And if so, if the tyrannosaurs were just scavengers, who was doing
> the predation? Is it realistic to suppose that dromaeosaur packs
> were the main predators of multi-ton ceratopids, hadrosaurs, and
> ankylosaurs?
>
> Before somebody flames me regarding dromaeosaur capabilities, I
> certainly think that a pack could take down a lone individual from
> one of the above groups (well, maybe not the ankylo), but I just
> can't see them doing ALL the bladework.
>
> There's my two cents,
> Matt Wedel