Re: TROODON, FABROSAURUS AND TOOTH TAXA IN GENERAL

[Dinogeorge@aol.com]

In a message dated 97-09-10 15:14:33 EDT, smithjb@sas.upenn.edu writes:

<< Peter has a point, since they don't seem to be referencable on 
 GEOREF or other commonly used sources.  Are they peer-reviewed? >>

Heck, no. But they were actually >paid for(!),< and at a rate that reasonably
compensated the work done. To me, then and now, that's more important.