[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: SINOSAUROPTERYX is not a bird!
At 02:30 PM 4/18/97 -0400, Ronald Orenstein wrote:
>Just to clarify - no one ever said it was a bird. What was claimed was
>that it was a dinosaur with feathers - an idea that seems quite
>questionable, now (it seems to have had some sort of external structure,
>but I guess that is as far as we can go).
The Chinsese namers considered it a bird, hence the name.
** Dinosauria On-Line. Home of THE DINOSTORE ** "Those who trade a **
** (Dino stuff for sale), Jeff's Journal of ** little freedom for a **
** Dinosaur Paleontology, Jeff's Dinosaur ** little security will soon **
** Picture Gallery, and The DOL Dinosaur ** find they have none of **
** Omnipedia. http://www.dinosauria.com ** either." -- Jeff Poling **