[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: DINOGEORGE'S FOOTPRINTS

To: Multiple recipients of list <dinosaur@lepomis.psych.upenn.edu>
Subject: Re: DINOGEORGE'S FOOTPRINTS
From: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 10:28:06 -0500
Reply-to: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Sender: dinosaur@lepomis.psych.upenn.edu

In a message dated 96-01-31 03:07:45 EST, steve.cole@genie.com writes:

>FOOTPRINT GENERA: Dinogeorge, did I read you right? That there are
>700 separate types of footprints known to science that are not tied
>to genera known from body parts? What did you mean by doubling the
>length of the list if we include genera known only by tracks?
>
>

I haven't actually counted, but there are lots and lots of footprint genera,
and even more species. Maybe doubling is an exaggeration, but not much.

Prev by Date: Re: CROCODYLOMORPH ENDOTHERMY
Next by Date: Re: Archie bones
Previous by thread: DINOGEORGE'S FOOTPRINTS
Next by thread: Neil Clark
Indexes: