[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Euoplo



On Thu, 25 Jan 1996, Rob Meyerson wrote:

> As an additional question, what is the status of _Ankylosaurus_ within this 
> group?  Is it still a questionable genus?

I wasn't aware that it ever was!  Anyway, as the first named, 
_Ankylosaurus_ has priority over all other names.  It looks to me like 
we've got pretty good material of _Ankylosaurus magniventris_, certainly 
enough to show that it was closely related to _Euoplocephalus_ and 
_Talarurus_ (sorry, George), and that it was the largest and latest of 
the ankylosaurs (as I recall).

> Rob
> 
> ***
> "Don't panic!"

Thanks for the advice!

Nick Pharris
Pacific Lutheran University
Tacoma, WA 98447
(206)535-8204
PharriNJ@PLU.edu

"If you can't convince them, confuse them." -- Harry S. Truman