Re: Colbert & Ostrom Talk (fwd)

[Dinogeorge@aol.com]

In a message dated 96-01-17 20:02:49 EST, ornstn@inforamp.net (Ronald
Orenstein) writes:

>Of course Asimov makes one goof - he claims that the endoheretic differs
>from the exoheretic in that he is usually greeted with public disinterest
>and rarely profits financially from his heresy.  I will leave others on this
>list to suggest that Bakker may be an exception....
>
>

Some of Bakker's heresies have become orthodoxy (even dogma), some have
proved incorrect, and some remain undecidable.

You want heresy? How about, "Saurischia is paraphyletic (because it excludes
Ornithischia)," and "the Birds Came First." (Just tooting my own horn.)